I'm leaving my job at Business for Social Responsibility and moving from Berkeley to Washington D.C. in July. The plan is to find a job in journalism or politics or at a non-profit. If you know about anything, email me at mrochmes[at]hotmail.com.
I hope to revive this space as a journal of my experiences in D.C.
Satellite is gone, but I hope to set up some kind of online archive for it. Something new is in the works. In the meantime, check out my homepage: MichaelRochmes.com.

A couple links:
A review of the new Berkeley Rep production, Cloud Nine.

I have another book review in the Daily Cal today. Erin wrote one too.

On his site today, Rahul posted this odd advertisement that he found in an old magazine. While he seems to think it shows bad intentions by the US government (offering bonuses to people who find uranium in their backyards), I think it might just have been a sincere attempt to rip people off.

Apparently they cancelled "The Education of Max Bickford", which while inevitable, is also unfortunate. I never even got to plug the show on this site. "Max Bickford" was far from perfect, but it was nice to have a mirror put up to college life that didn't focus on sex. Its ripped-from-the-headlines style occasionally made it melodramatic (of course, not on the level of "Boston Public"), and it got worse as the season wore on, but it was worth watching most of the time, both for the Berkeley-like controversies and Bickford's interactions with his colleagues (the episode where he completes his thinly-veiled memoir is a good example) .

Professors make interesting subjects. There's a whole sub-genre of literature about college professors. Like "Wonder Boys", which I didn't read, but saw on video recently. The movie suffered from some of the same problems as another Michael Chabon work, "The Adventures of Kavalier and Clay", those being mainly over complication and too many subplots. Ironically, overwriting is the problem the protagonist is having with his novel in "Wonder Boys". I loved the set-up, and the interactions between the different characters, but in the end, there are too many lose ends that don't add anything and that all get solved together, with really no solution.

The Daily Cal published my review of "Everything is Illuminated" today. Unfortunately, their website does not seem to be up. So go pick up a copy in the meantime. [update: here's the link].

This evening I saw a warning to prospective students scrawled on a newspaper rack in black marker. It read something like, "Beware of Cal, it's really Bezerkeley". I can't be sure the grafitti was the work of a reactionary, but doesn't it sound like this or this? Why would you want to discount the value of the degree you just recieved by disparaging the place it came from? Or if you hated it so much, why didn't you leave?

I've said it before and I'll say it again: there is a huge audience of right wingers for any attacks on the academy. But while Rory and others may gain fame and Patriot readers, they're just a bunch of self-hating intellectuals.

I've been using blogtrack to check for updates, but it doesn't work all the time--sometimes it misses updates, sometimes says there have been updates when there apparently haven't been.

It's been a few days since I've posted. I've been busy. I started my internship on Friday, but mostly I've been playing with my new digital camera--a graduation present--and doing other extracurricular, er, postcurricular activities. I went to the Clarendon Hills concert, and a couple graduation parties on Saturday. Today my girlfriend Erin and I went for a hike and then watched the Lakers win another close one. They're going to give me a heart attack one of these days.
Anyways, I hope to post soon regarding Wonder Boys (which I finally just saw), relating it to Michael Chabon's other book and the television show Max Bickford. And I'm reading Jonathon Safran Foer's book Everything Is Iluminated; a review may be forthcoming.

Beetle Beat says "Page 1: Dead body found in park, confirming what everyone already knew." But the theory around my house was that Chandra Levy was kidnapped by some rich Saudi and forced to join his harem. (Okay, I never believed this either, but they say it happens). Anyway, this still doesn't confirm anything. Where has she been all this time? This is total conspiracy fodder. The current prediction at my house is that we (encouraged by the media) will spend all summer talking about Levy and shark attacks, and then around September.... Oh, nevermind.

By the way, is a potential war between India and Pakistan news anymore? (Asked about his statement a few days ago about "war clouds," he said, "The sky is clear; there are no clouds." He quickly added, "But in a clear sky there can be sudden lightning." Then, whether to keep Pakistan off guard, or because he is willing to give peace a chance, he said, "I hope there will not be any lightning.")What do they call this, saber rattling? It must be another Star Wars metaphor.

For Calstuff's Kevin and any other future Daily Cal columnists, I have a suggestion. Feel free to ignore it. I think it would be cool if a columnist used his column not only for a weekly rant, but to unfold a narrative. Make up a few fake friends, perhaps a alternate narrator persona, and a plot arc for the semester. It could be something simple like boy meets girl, boy loses girl, yadda yadda. I know some people say that there is too much narrative in our society, but I say there isn't enough in the Daily Cal. You could even slip the story into more timely pieces: "I was having dinner with my friend Tania, and she said..." The possibilities are endless.

Another thing via the Times: Harvard is tightening its grading standards. They're making a B+ more valuable so that professors won't be afraid to give them instead of A-.In addition, now only 60% of students will be able to graduate with honors (instead of the current 90%). The whole thing seems overblown to me. How many people graduate with honors at Berkeley? I'm guessing less than 10%.

Also, on the way home I noticed a flyer for the Clarendon Hills. They're playing this Saturday at 925 Gilman (8pm, $5). Back in the day, these guys played the Green Party Party (I couldn't link to the image so I stole it). Pepito Pea was also once a nominal Satellite editor.

There's some interesting stuff in the New York Times:
The A's traded (the other) Giambi; somebody found Chandra Levy's body; there's a good editorial about the terrorism warnings (at least the first few paragraphs); and a book review about the cosmopolitan muse of dada.

Thanks Bayblog, for noticing me (unlike some other awards), and putting political differences aside.

more on this later.

Until then, check out your moment of zen.

I put my first Satellite article up on the archives. It's about the third world Liberation Front. (I apologize for the lack of design on the page.)

I start a two-month internship tomorrow with Terrain, the magazine of Berkeley's Ecology Center.

Last night was the season finale and Will Ferrell's last night on SNL. They made a surprisingly big deal about it. I feel like they usually wait for someone to die before they make this big a deal over them. Ferrell was in every sketch, including his familiar Alex Trebek and Fidel Castro, but he didn’t do his George W. Bush impression. His departure leaves the question, who will do Bush next year?

This reminds me of an idea I had a little while ago. I hate the a cappella groups that seem to be ubiquitous on college campuses, Berkeley not excepted. They always do the same old songs. Wouldn’t it be more interesting if they did songs based on the news? A little political parody might go a long way. Possible topics include the Catholic Priest scandal or the Palestine-Israel conflict. There’s a whole genre of Mexican music that does this kind of current event reporting, and rap occasionally does it too.

As announced at half time of the Nets-Celtics game, Golden State will get the third pick in the NBA draft, after Chicago Bulls and Houston. Houston will probably pick Yao Ming, and Chicago will probably pick Duke's Jay Williams, or maybe trade the pick for a more experienced player. Meanwhile, the game is really good. Unlike most Eastern Conference games, this game is actually high scoring. The Nets are winning.

I saw a debate about marriage on Fox News today between someone who wants to pass a national "defense of marriage" act, and a woman who thinks homosexuals should be allowed to marry. The conservative said that he wasn't against equal rights for gays, including the right to adopt (he would leave that up to an electoral process); he primarily wanted to defend the heterosexual-only definition of the word. He also said that marriage was about protecting children (and thus, keeping "marriage" heterosexual would somehow send a "positive" message to children).

One of my guests pointed out a contradiction in the conservative’s argument. If marriage is truly about protection of children, you should want people adopting children to marry, and thus homosexuals, since they can adopt, should also be able to marry. I suspect he doesn’t really support the right of homosexuals to adopt. If I’m right he’s being very intellectually dishonest.

Later in the day, we watched as the Lakers demolished the Kings in Sacramento.

I'm sorry I'm missing the "blogger party". I was entertaining out of town guests who came for my graduation.

I finished my paper. It's crap. But at this point, the day before graduation, I couldn't really care less. Anyway, I'd rather read the profile of Shaq in the current New Yorker (I don't think it's online).
Speaking of Shaq, those Lakers are sooo good. As predicted below, the conference finals are down to 1st vs. 3rd seed match-ups. The symmetry of how they got there is pretty amazing. Each series went 5 games after being split 1-1.

The new issue of the East Bay Express has an article about David Brock’s tenure at the Daily Cal, where he was known to embellish and generally cause trouble. The article details numerous discrepancies between his book and reality. In other words, he’s a liar. I think my response to the article was the opposite of what the author intended. I feel, actually, kind of inspired. Although one must, I feel, uphold journalistic ethics, David Brock comes off as someone who could always find the most interesting part of a news story. His hubris may have reached too far, but at least he isn’t boring.

Regarding the Daily Cal’s trouble with the ASUC, I have a couple questions which perhaps somebody can answer. As the recent earthquake reminded me, isn’t Eshleman going to be torn down pretty soon? In that case, the Daily Cal needs to find an alternate space regardless. And what about the seventh floor? Can’t that be made usable for ASUC groups? What has the executive vice president been doing all year anyway? I think if anything, the Daily Cal’s lease should be made less expensive. I’m sure the market value of that kind of space is a lot lower than it was a couple years ago. But regardless, I think the paper will pull through. We’re only going through a temporary slump in ad revenue that is affecting all kinds of publications, but the economy is bound to turn around soon.